More signatories on WB letter; Khmericans demonstrate at Hor Namhong US Visit

The open letter from global civil society to the World Bank asking the financial institution to maintain the freeze on new loans to Cambodia now has 127 signatories, while Cambodian-Americans demonstrate outside the US State Department as Cambodian Foreign Minister Hor Namhong met with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

OPEN LETTER TO WORLD BANK PRESIDENT ROBERT ZOELLICK AND PRESIDENT-ELECT JIM YONG KIM
MAY 30, 2012

Dear President Zoellick and President-Elect Kim,

It has recently come to our attention that the World Bank is considering ending its suspension of new loans to the Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) and preparing an Interim Strategy Note to facilitate new lending. We, the undersigned organizations, write to express our deeply held view that, despite some positive developments regarding the Boeung Kak lake case, now is the wrong time to end the suspension. Doing so would not only risk undoing gains made, but would also send a dangerous message to the RGC in light of the spate of recent killings and unwarranted jailing of activists, including Boeung Kak community leaders. We believe that these appalling events call not for reward and the injection of more funds, but rather a coordinated and public condemnation by the international community, including the World Bank.

The past month has seen a series of shocking and inexcusable events in Cambodia. On April 26th, Chut Wutty, a tireless environmental activist was shot dead by armed forces after taking two journalists to a logging area in Koh Kong province. On May 16th, Heng Chantha, a 14-year old girl was killed by a soldier during a brutal forced eviction of a village in Kratie province.

On May 22nd female residents of Boeung Kak staged a peaceful demonstration on the sand dunes that cover what was once a village on the shores of the lake. The demonstration followed thwarted efforts by one family to demarcate the boundary of their home, which had been submerged in sand during the filling of the lake. Whilst singing about their plight, the protesters were surrounded by a mixed force of military police, anti-riot police and district guards, who used violence to break up the demonstration and then arrested 13 women, including a 72-year old. A video clip of these events is available at this link: http://www.licadho-cambodia.org/video.php?perm=31.

On May 24th the women were convicted by the Phnom Penh court on baseless charges of inciting others to take land illegally and obtaining land illegally. Seven of the women were sentenced to two years and six months in prison, five were sentenced to two years and the 72-year old woman, Nget Khun, was sentenced to a term of one year. During the trial, the police arrested two more Boeung Kak community representatives who were prepared to testify as witnesses for the 13 women on trial.

We respectfully appeal to you not to authorize re-engagement by the Bank with the RGC under these circumstances and to continue the suspension until a more strategic and judicious moment for engagement arises.

We regard the issuance of land titles to 631 Boeung Kak families earlier this year following the Prime Minister’s sub decree granting the remaining residents 12.44 hectares of land around the former lake as a significant human rights victory. We understand that the principled stand taken by the World Bank following the Inspection Panel’s findings of non-compliance with operational policies during the design and implementation of the Land Management and Administration Project played an integral part in achieving this outcome. We applaud the bold leadership of the President in this situation and consider this wise decision-making to have contributed in no small part to the legal security and piece of mind that these 631 Cambodian families now enjoy.

Yet, we remain deeply concerned about the 3500 Boeung Kak families, who had already reluctantly accepted the inadequate compensation package and left their lakeside homes under extreme duress, and who now suffer severe hardship trying to make ends meet each day. We are also concerned about the 94 families that have been excluded from the benefits of the Prime Minister’s sub decree and remain under the threat of forced eviction. Together these families represent an estimated 85 percent of all Boeung Kak residents who submitted the Request to the World Bank Inspection Panel.

We are aware that there may be some entry points for UN-HABITAT to support these displaced and excluded families. We urge the World Bank to take all possible action to facilitate this support, including through high-level dialogue with relevant agencies and provision of financing for remedial action. We also note that there may be other organizations in a position to operationalize aspects of the Bank Management’s January 2011 Action Plan, including financing measures that respond to the needs of tenure insecure and resettled communities from the Boeung Kak area (at para 76, Table 1). The Bank should not passively accept the lack of progress in supporting displaced and excluded groups to date as a fait accompli. Rather, it should proactively work to identify possible interlocutors to remedy harm done, and as Bank Management itself commits to do, “make every effort to implement the Action Plan” (at para 78). If necessary, this should entail the provision of unilateral Bank support to displaced families through a trust fund and administered through an NGO or other agency.

The community itself has appealed to you, President Zoellick, to ensure a fair resolution for the displaced and excluded families before the Bank provides any further financing to the RGC. The public statements made by Bank representatives in August 2011 have led the community to believe that this would be the case. We note that Country Director Annette Dixon stated at the time: “Until an agreement is reached with the residents of Boeung Kak Lake, we do not expect to provide any new lending to Cambodia.”

The World Bank lending freeze provided a powerful boost to the community’s five-year struggle, which has become an inspiration to marginalized communities throughout Cambodia facing dislocation from their homes, land and the natural resources that they depend upon for survival. We believe that re-engaging now, particularly following the unlawful arrest and imprisonment of Boeung Kak community leaders, would send a dangerous message of approval to the RGC and undermine the community’s hope that they will not be left alone in their stand against the powerful forces of injustice.

Commitments made by the World Bank, either privately or publically, should not be reneged upon, or else the credibility of the Bank and its commitment to its safeguard policies and contractual requirements on borrowers to respect them will be seriously undermined. Conversely, we believe that if the Bank maintains the freeze until a comprehensive agreement is reached with the Requesters, and the brave human rights defenders of Boeung Kak Lake are released from prison, it will contribute immeasurably to the twin long-term goals of a more just and equitable Cambodian society and a more accountable World Bank.

Sincerely,

1. Accountability Counsel – USA
2. ActionAid
3. Action for Environment and Community (AEC) – Cambodia
4. Affiliated Network for Social Accountability (ANSA)-EAP – Cambodia
5. AidWatch – Australia
6. Aksi – For Gender, Social and Ecological Justice – Indonesia
7. American Center for Labor Solidarity/American Federation of Labor – Congress of Industrial Organizations (ACILS/AFL-CIO) – Cambodia
8. Amnesty International Kenya – Kenya
9. Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development
10. Bank Information Center (BIC) – USA
11. Banteay Srei – Cambodia
12. Bretton Woods Project – UK
13. Building Community Voices (BCV) – Cambodia
14. Building and Wood Workers Trade Union Federation (BWTUC)
15. Business and Community Foundation – India
16. Cambodia ASEAN Youth Future (CAM-ASEAN) – Cambodia
17. Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions (CATU) – Cambodia
18. Cambodian Center for Human Rights – Cambodia
19. Cambodian Confederation of Unions (CCU) – Cambodia
20. Cambodian Defenders Project – Cambodia
21. Cambodian Food and Service Workers’ Federation (CFSWF) – Cambodia
22. Cambodian Independent Civil-Servant Association (CICA) – Cambodia
23. Cambodian Independent Teachers’ Association (CITA) – Cambodia
24. Cambodian Indigenous Youth Association – Cambodia
25. Cambodian League For The Promotion And Defense Of Human Rights (LICADHO) – Cambodia
26. Cambodian Tourism and Service Workers Federation (CTSWF) – Cambodia
27. Cambodian Watchdog Council (CWC) – Cambodia
28. Cambodian Workers Center for Development (CWCD) – Cambodia
29. Cambodian Youth Network (CYN) – Cambodia
30. Castan Centre for Human Rights Law, Monash University – Australia
31. CENCA – Peru
32. Christian Aid – United Kingdom
33. Christians for Social Justice – Cambodia
34. Coalition for Cambodian Farmer Community (CCFC) – Cambodia
35. Community Legal Education Center – Cambodia
36. Community Organization Information Network (CONET) – South Korea
37. Community Organization for People’s Action (COPA) – Thailand
38. Community Organization of the Philippines Enterprises Foundation (COPE) – Philippines
39. Community Organizations Practitioners Association (COPA) – Keyna
40. Community Organizers Multiversity (COM) – Philippines
41. Community Peace-building Network – Cambodia
42. CONAM – Brazil
43. Coophabitat – Dominican Republic
44. DanChurchAid – Denmark
45. Development and Peace – Canada
46. Diakonia – Sweden
47. Dignity International – Malaysia
48. EarthRights International
49. Economic and Social Rights Centre – Kenya
50. Empowering Youth in Cambodia (EYC) – Cambodia
51. Equitable Cambodia – Cambodia
52. Farming Study Group (FSG) – Timor Leste
53. FEDVI – Argentina
54. Fener-Balat-Ayvnsaray (FEBAYDER) –Turkey
55. FIAN Germany – Germany
56. Focus on the Global South
57. Fongtil (The NGO Forum of Timor-Leste) – Timor Leste
58. Forum Syd – Sweden
59. Four Regions Slum Network (FRSN) – Thailand
60. Forum Tau Matan (FTM) – Timor Leste
61. FOVELIC – Peru
62. Gender and Development for Cambodia (GADC) – Cambodia
63. Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
64. Habitat International Coalition (HIC)
65. Haburas Foundation – Timor Leste
66. Heinrich Böll Stiftung – Germany
67. Housing and Land Rights Network – Habitat International Coalition (HIC)
68. Housing Rights Task Force – Cambodia
69. Huairou Commission
70. Human Rights Advocates
71. Human Rights Alert – India
72. Human Rights Commission of Pakistan
73. Human Rights Law Centre – Australia
74. Human Settlement Foundation – Thailand
75. Inclusive Development International (IDI)
76. Independent Democracy of Informal Economy Association (IDEA)
77. Interfaith Cooperation Forum (ICF) – Hong Kong
78. International Accountability Project (IAP)
79. International Alliance of Inhabitants (IAI)
80. Katuba Women’s Association (KWA) – Zambia
81. Khmer Ahimsa – Cambodia
82. Kadadaluk Sumulituk Instituti (KSI) – Timor Leste
83. KSL-Public Art Laboratory – Turkey
84. Komitu Architects – Finland
85. Labour, Health and Human Rights Development Centre – Nigeria
86. La’o Hamutuk – Timor Leste
87. La Plataforma Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, Democracia y Desarrollo (PIDHDD) – Ecuador
88. Leaders and Organizers of Community Organizations in Asia (LOCOA)
89. LICADHO Canada – Cambodia
90. Love146 – Cambodia
91. Mekong Watch – Japan
92. My Village – Cambodia
93. National Free Trade Union – Sri Lanka
94. Norwegian People’s Aid – Norway
95. Ntankah Village Women Common Initiative Group (NVWCIG) – Cameroon
96. Oxfam
97. People’s Action for Change (PAC) – Cambodia
98. Phoenix Take Back the Night – USA
99. Philippine Alliance for Human Rights – Philippines
100. Planet Wheeler Foundation – Australia
101. Red aba Rai (The Land Network) – Timor Leste
102. Rainbow Community Kampuchea – Cambodia
103. Rwanda Women Network (RWN) – Rwanda
104. Sahmakum Teang Tnaut (STT) – Cambodia
105. Sawit Watch – Indonesia
106. Servants Cambodia – Cambodia
107. Shelter for the Poor – Bangladesh
108. Slum Women’s Initiative for Development – Uganda
109. Solidaritas Perempuan (Women’s Solidarity for Human Rights) – Indonesia
110. Southeast Asia Development Program (SADP) – Cambodia
111. Spaces for Change – Nigeria
112. Strey Khmer – Cambodia
113. Sulukule Platform – Turkey
114. Haburas Foundation – Timor-Leste
115. The HAK Association – Timor-Leste
116. The Labour Rights Institute of Timor-Leste (LAIFET) – Timor-Leste
117. The Social Justice Committee of Montreal – Cananda
118. Tozder, Tozkoporan Local Association – Turkey
119. Trocaire Timor-Leste
120. Ukimbi – Finland
121. Urban Movements Istanbul – Turkey
122. Urban Poor Associates – Philippines
123. Urgewald – Germany
124. Validebag Volunteers – Turkey
125. Village Focus Cambodia – Cambodia
126. Volunteer for Sustainable Development – Cambodia
127. WITNESS

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s